What Exactly Is a First Examination Report? (And Why It Terrifies Most Inventors)

The First Examination Report (FER) is the Indian Patent Office's detailed assessment of your patent application. Think of it as your invention's report card – except instead of grades, you get objections that need addressing within a strict deadline.

But here's what most people don't understand: receiving an FER isn't bad news; it's actually progress. It means your application has moved from the filing queue into active examination. The real challenge begins now.

The FER serves a crucial purpose in the patent ecosystem. It's the examiner's professional opinion on whether your invention meets the stringent requirements for patent protection under Indian law. This isn't a casual review – it's a thorough technical and legal analysis that can determine the fate of your intellectual property.

The Anatomy of an FER: Four Critical Parts

Every FER follows a standardised structure designed to systematically evaluate your invention:

Part I: Summary of the Report
This section provides a quick overview of the examiner's findings. You'll see a simple table indicating whether your claims pass or fail for novelty, inventive step, industrial applicability, and clarity requirements.
Part II: Detailed Technical Report
This is the meat of the FER. Here, the examiner provides comprehensive analysis including prior art citations (those mysterious D1, D2, D3 references), specific technical objections, and detailed reasoning for each rejection.
Part III: Formal Requirements
Administrative compliance issues are addressed here. Missing forms, power of attorney problems, or procedural defects are highlighted. These are often the easiest to fix but can be fatal if ignored.
Part IV: Documents on Record
This section lists all documents the examiner considered, providing a complete filing history that helps you understand the examination context.

The Road to Examination: Form 18 vs Form 18A Showdown

Before you can receive an FER, you must file a Request for Examination. This is where strategic thinking becomes crucial, as you have two distinct paths.

Form 18: The Standard Route

Timeline: Normal examination processing

Processing Time: 12-18 months typically

Small Entity Fee: ₹4,000

Large Entity Fee: ₹60,000

Best For: Applications without time pressure. This gives you time to prepare your response strategy and gather supporting technical documentation.

Form 18A: The Express Lane

Timeline: Expedited examination processing

Processing Time: 6-12 months typically

Small Entity Fee: ₹8,000

Large Entity Fee: ₹20,000

Best For: Time-sensitive applications with qualifying criteria. Form 18A isn't available to everyone, but it can cut your examination time in half.

Who Can Apply for Expedited Examination? (The Complete Checklist)

You're eligible for Form 18A if your application falls under any of these categories:

Where India was the competent International Searching Authority (ISA) or IPEA.
The applicant is a DPIIT-registered Startup.
The applicant is a Small Entity.
At least one applicant is a female.
The applicant is a Government Entity, Institution, or Company.
The application pertains to sectors notified by the Central Government.
The application is eligible under international agreements.

Always verify your eligibility with supporting documents before filing Form 18A. Incorrect filings can delay your process even further.

The Ticking Clock: Understanding FER Response Timeline

Once you receive an FER, you have exactly 6 months to respond from the date it is dispatched. You can request a three-month extension for an additional fee, but it must be done before the original deadline expires.

What Happens If You Don't Reply? (The Point of No Return)

Missing the FER response deadline is catastrophic. Your application is automatically abandoned under Section 21(1) of the Patents Act, with no possibility of revival. This means:

All filing fees are completely forfeited.
Your invention details become public without any protection.
You lose all priority date advantages.
No appeals or revival mechanisms exist. Deadline failures are absolute.

Common FER Objections: The Usual Suspects

After reviewing hundreds of FERs, certain objections appear with predictable frequency. Understanding these helps you prepare stronger applications.

Download Sample First Examination Report

Lack of Novelty (Section 2(1)(j))

This means your invention, or parts of it, already exist in prior art. This objection appears in approximately 50% of FERs.

"Claim 1 lacks novelty being anticipated by document D1 (IN202441082157A) which discloses a gas monitoring system comprising weighing unit with load cell, detection unit with microcontroller and gas sensor..."

Lack of Inventive Step (Obviousness)

This means your invention would be obvious to a person skilled in the art. It's the most critical objection and is cited in around 70% of FERs, usually involving a combination of prior art documents.

"Claims 1-12 lack inventive step being obvious in view of D1 and D2 combination, as both references teach gas monitoring with weight measurement and leak detection..."

Section 3 Exclusions: The Patent-Killers

Indian patent law excludes certain subject matter from patentability under Section 3. These objections can be particularly challenging.

Section 3(d): Enhanced Efficacy Requirement (prevents "evergreening").
Section 3(e): Mere Admixtures (simple combinations without synergy).
Section 3(k): Computer Programs Per Se (pure algorithms and business methods).
Section 3(i): Medical Treatment Methods.

Clarity and Definitiveness Issues

This means your claims are ambiguous or poorly defined. These are often the easiest to address through careful claim amendments.

"The phrase 'validate gas leaks through concurrent weight reduction and gas concentration increase' lacks specificity regarding validation method or criteria..."

Drafting Your FER Response: The Art of Patent Prosecution

Responding to an FER requires both technical expertise and legal strategy. A professional response should always follow a proven format.

Download Sample FER Reply Format

Step 1: The Response Structure

Summary of FER Objections: Begin by acknowledging the examiner's concerns.
Summary of Amendments Made: Clearly explain the changes you've made.
Point-by-Point Response: Address every single objection raised in the FER.
Conclusion and Request for Grant: End with a professional request for the patent grant.

Step 2: Amendment Strategy

Golden Rule: Only amend claims when absolutely necessary, and ensure all amendments are supported by the original specification. Never add new matter.

Step 3: Tackling Specific Objections

Your response must be precise and well-supported. For a novelty objection, acknowledge the prior art, identify specific differences, explain their technical significance, and support your claims with references to your specification.

For an obviousness objection, challenge the motivation to combine references, highlight unexpected results, or demonstrate synergistic effects.

The Bottom Line: Transform Challenge into Opportunity

The FER isn't your enemy – it's your roadmap to success. Every objection is an opportunity to strengthen your patent, distinguish your invention more clearly, and secure more robust protection.

The difference between patent success and failure often comes down to how professionally and strategically you handle that first examination report. It's not about having a perfect invention – it's about professional preparation, strategic thinking, and persistent execution.

Patent Filing Cost

First Examination Report in India: The Make-or-Break Moment in Your Patent Journey (2025 Complete Guide)

FER Knowledge Quiz

Your FER Knowledge Score